The NATIVE BROTHERHOOD OF BRITISH COLUMBIA Native Voice VOL. In NATIVE its 41st year of publication INDIAN 16, No. August/Sept. 4 1988 EDUCATION —A STUDENT'S PERSPECTIVE tion The National Indian Policy, Drugs & Alcohol and Nuuchah-nulth of Symposium II was held at Kahna- Student Survival School, Quebec dian 8, 9 and Education Eagle has Takes Flight." 10. The Forum Landed; A spoke National called New it the importance of culture, of his students brought some valid pride for his parents and his heritage. on concerns August Council Networking. Native wake Tribal Education to the attention of Political Two the He spoke and made of the “New Generation" In- “The Generation Panel on posium. Day Panelists of included John Indian Nor- muses His Rayner thern representing Affairs. Notably, and the reference to George Eras- Sym- statement powerful tention students and his earlier voice this year. commanded message at- received due the ex- That “New Generation" was a response. noticeable force Inter-Campus at Kahnawake. Native Student The Net- questioned cess” by the “Consultation The pressed INAC. their expressed work co-ordinated a B.C. Student - The Policy states “1d) This of six to participate in come They had an table which received as they a of April across gathered Canada. to be Is consultation pro- a Scow or is this John tentative preparation pro- a They Rayner “says” it is a culture which Did over 20 any Native people have the Policy across a paper Draft and the The Roles be discussion. Indian The The created in Native was the questons discussion of Catch is biased are strong How? support of energy student Ontario and bodies people are put at and but it was made clear answers and part was to was that maintain to maintain Beverly Scow was Communication there a the to c/o Vancouver analyze indicate Review the Time and frame regional consulta- is inadequate - stated as June-September. person. consultation only sent to packages B.C. Bands in Students and consultation ends in Center munities B.C. com- fishing season and holi- B.C. day season for educators. 1S7 On Each person of the B.C. Student contributed to the Day Education date Delegation to Three our venture and continue force in the indicated “New active workshops of and given received a man- recom- from workshops and the discussion. From the B.C. stu- Genera- participation Post was Indian the dent tion," National success floor potential the Forum mendations of ques- Hastings Vancouver, V5L lack Commit- completed mid-September. East a reports. mid-July 1607 respond momen- Contact Indian not com- identified Native misinter- dif- were Inter-Campus be do to Native However, c/o can they consultation the education. that students of the process and that It be a Beverly be a member of the core a student group representative. B.C. Student Delegation as a group for their re- interest. Is - tum. they inspir- the that If ex- tion munication if appear tionnaires ficult situation. Alberta. enthusiasm Kahnawake 22 would tee ing as Secondary is into in - perienced Forum the When? of The quality Continued it Saskatchewan, Na- and was preted There the directed spond, around of en- a action. priority Education for commended towards Indian Questionnaire. Questionnaire Policy. dialogue a recommended The thusaistic for and was for need Con- as Networking: Potentials” the “Native - Student to strive Scow presented identified Canada. sultation Beverly ac- input part from constructive students into participated in date. was in channelled Networking - Workshop encouraged contacts Beverly Student energy tivities. they facilitated and the 1, tional right Simon for significant cess. attention, this as by support informacess tion effect floor the 1989.” Symposium. into of policy it will Delegation people Pro- delegation emerged a powerful in Educa- orator. Simon Lucas Jr. from on next page con-